It is almost guaranteed that a considerable number of theatrical aficionados would spit in the face of the question above, turn on their heels and flounce off stage-left. On the other hand, it is equally certain many of we, less exuberant characters, may have seen only a handful of stage shows. Against the exhaustive list of television shows and films we have viewed, theatre figures could be veritably insignificant. It is certainly debateable, therefore, that theatre is becoming an indifferent cast member in a new film-and-television-headlined act. Of course, it is indisputable that in more humble times, prior to the age of technology, theatre was a focal feature of many societies. Nowadays, the money involved in the theatre industry does not even amount to a fraction of what the television and film industries are swimming in. Which begs the question: is all the world still a stage? Or is it now one giant screen?

Is all the world a stage? Or has it become one giant screen?
Ask anyone in our generation to name ten famous actors, it is fairly certain that not one of those mentioned would specialise in theatre. This is due to our lack of exposition, particularly in Dubai, to theatre. Presently, even in the UK, theatre is simply not as accessible as television and film are to the public, especially in the current economic climate. It is assumed in Britain that trips to the theatre are a sporadic indulgence, whereas a television, once regarded as an essential fixture in the average household, can now be found in multiple rooms. Television and film are unquestionably more obtainable, affordable, undemanding sources of entertainment, which suit the idle, onesie-clad, sofa-bound British citizenry perfectly. However, this by no means equates to a lack of appreciation for the theatre in our modern society.
In 2010, over 12.5 million people attended the theatre in Broadway, and this figure continues to rise each year. With 42 new shows being staged on Broadway in the same year, it cannot even be suggested that the theatre is an aged convention. Theatre cannot be defined by one show, or one genre. It incessantly reinvents itself to provide audiences with a unique experience every time. The enjoyment yielded by a successful theatre show cannot be touched by those of modern, one-dimensional forms of entertainment, both for the performers and the audiences. However, this still seems to fail in persuading the masses to embrace the theatre.
Perhaps a reason for this aversion to the industry is modern-day prejudice against those who immerse themselves in it. Male theatregoers and performers are often victims of public preconceptions, as it is a practice that can be considered particularly camp by ignorant observers. Any historian would be able to see the irony in this custom, in view of the Elizabethan times when all actors were men, and it was felonious for a woman to participate in theatre. The tables have now turned, however, and some men purposefully steer clear of the theatre to avoid the abuse they may incur.
Be that as it may, there is no parallel criticism for male actors on the silver screen. This may seem odd, however, as many reputed film and television actors (both male and female) frequently indulge in theatrical works, and their early training undoubtedly included a good many years of theatre. When David Tennant wasn’t operating the tardis and fighting Daleks, he was (and still is) a member of the Royal Shakespeare Company, along with Dame Helen Mirren, Dustin Hoffman and Jeremy Irons, among many other notable names. Hugh Jackman is currently starring in his own Broadway show, Hugh Jackman, Back on Broadway. On the other side of the Atlantic, Rowan Atkinson played Fagin for eight months on the West-End production of Oliver!, only quitting for health reasons. Accumulatively, this all indicates that those in the television and film industries still have an unwavering respect for the theatre, and are willing to engross themselves in it regardless of the lower pay.
Theatre is an old-aged, yet immortal man, who commands unlimited and unparalleled respect from his youthful companions, television and film. While from a distance he may seem straitlaced and outmoded, once you become acquainted with him he has a surprisingly current and inventive grasp on humanity. He realises television and film are revelling in exceptional fortune and success, rekindling memories of adoration from his former glorious life; but he also realises that they would be nowhere without his guidance and teachings. So while he carries on entertaining his humble disciples, he finds comfort in the knowledge that he has provided a lasting service to the rest of the world, despite receiving less recognition for it than he deserves.